lundi 10 juin 2013

Misanthrope

 My hate is general, I detest all men;
Some because they are wicked and do evil,
Others because they tolerate the wicked,
Refusing them the active vigorous scorn
Which vice should stimulate in virtuous minds.

(The bad things that men do should make us 

reject the men that do them if we are good)

 

Molière's character Alceste in Le Misanthrope (1666)

 

Philosophy

In Western philosophy, misanthropy has been connected to isolation from human society. In Plato's Phaedo, Socrates defines the misanthrope in relation to his fellow man: "Misanthropy develops when without art one puts complete trust in somebody thinking the man absolutely true and sound and reliable and then a little later discovers him to be bad and unreliable...and when it happens to someone often...he ends up...hating everyone." Misanthropy, then, is presented as the result of thwarted expectations or even excessively naive optimism, since Plato argues that "art" would have allowed the potential misanthrope to recognize that the majority of men are to be found in between good and evil. Aristotle follows a more ontological route: the misanthrope, as an essentially solitary man, is not a man at all: he must be a beast or a god, a view reflected in the Renaissance of misanthropy as a "beast-like state."
It is important to distinguish between philosophical pessimism and misanthropy. Immanuel Kant said that "Of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing can ever be made," and yet this was not an expression of the uselessness of mankind itself. Kant further stated that hatred of mankind can take two distinctive forms, aversion from men (Anthropophobia) or enmity towards them. The condition can arise partly from dislike and partly from ill-will.
Another example of mistaken misanthropy is Jean-Paul Sartre's quote "Hell is other people." On the face of it, this looks deeply misanthropic, but actually Sartre may have been making an observation about the tendency of human beings to lack self-awareness. Unaware people tend to project out their worst fears and most deeply disliked personal characteristics onto other people, rather than participate in meaningful introspection. Thus, when they look at other people they often see the worst of what is in their own personality. Alternately, Sartre may have been making the statement that "Hell is other people" due to the existential dread that results from being surrounded by people who lack self-awareness and oppress others through acting in bad faith. See also Sartre's novel, La Nausée. Read in this context, Sartre's writings would be considered misanthropic since they are an attempt to derive an authentic meaning independent from mankind.
The German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer (an early influence on Friedrich Nietzsche) on the other hand, was as famously misanthropic as his reputation, which included his philosophical antinatalism. He wrote that "human existence must be a kind of error." It should be added, however, that misanthropy does not necessarily equate with an inhumane attitude towards humanity. Schopenhauer concluded, in fact, that ethical treatment of others was the best attitude, for we are all fellow sufferers and all part of the same will-to-live; he also discussed suicide with a sympathetic understanding which was rare in his own time, when it was largely a taboo subject.
Martin Heidegger had also been said to show misanthropy in his concern of the "they" — the tendency of people to conform to one view, which no-one has really thought through, but is just followed because, "they say so". This might be thought of as more of a criticism of conformity rather than people in general. Unlike Schopenhauer, Heidegger was opposed to any systematic ethics, however in some of his later thought he does see the possibility of harmony between people, as part of the four-fold, mortals, gods, earth and sky en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misanthropy.

Primacy of the intellect

God has bestowed upon human beings the gift of intellect, by which they can judge right and wrong. If what the prophets announce corresponds to what the intellect decrees, then prophets are superfluous. If it contradicts what the intellect decrees, then one should not listen to them. The discussion with the Barahima, the issue of the abrogation of the law, and the question of the possibility of substituting one law for another are also part of this argument. The argument is then applied to Islam in particular.
Connected with the claim of the sufficiency of human intellect is the discussion of various expressions of this intellect. Human children are taught to speak by their parents, from one generation to another, and this has always been the case. Ibn al-Rawandi is here probably addressing the question of whether human speech is natural or conventional. He seems to favor the solution of ilham (i.e., natural, innate knowledge), although the term itself does not appear. From the dai's answer we can see that Ibn al-Rawandi gave various examples of innate knowledge (the ability of birds to communicate with each other, the ability of ducks to swim, the ability of infants to suck milk), and that these were mentioned by him as being analogous to speech and understanding.
The sciences are also mentioned by Ibn al-Rawandi as proof for the sufficiency of the intellect. According to him, people developed the science of astronomy by watching the skies. They did not need a prophet to teach them how to watch. Nor did they need prophets in order to teach them how to build lutes. It is absurd to assume that without prophetic revelation people would not have learned that the intestines of a sheep, when dried and stretched upon a piece of wood, can produce pleasant tones. All these skills are acquired by the assiduous application of the inborn human intellect, discernment, and power of observation.
 (In early and pre-Islamic philosophy, certain thinkers such as Ibn al-Rawandi, a skeptic of Islam, and Muhammad ibn Zakariya ar-Razi often expressed misanthropic views)

samedi 8 juin 2013

leeswerk en agitprop

 Demented Agitprop: The Myth and Madness of Agenda 21 Conspiracy Theories
www.dementedagitprop.com

www.social-ecology.org/1991/01/left-green-perspectives-24/

Les zones humides face aux Grands Projets inutiles

Définies comme les régions où l’eau est le principal facteur d'influence du biotope et de sa biocénose, les zones humides sont protégées par la Convention internationale de Ramsar depuis 1971. Malgré cela, les zones humides de la planète, qu’elles soient d'eau salée (estuaire, prés salés, mangroves, marais et lagunes côtières...) ou d'eau douce (régions d'étangs, tourbières, prairies humides…), ont régressé de plus de moitié au cours du siècle dernier, en grande partie à cause de l’extension des.. www.agoravox.fr/actualites/societe/article/les-zones-humides-face-aux-grands-134552



www.oceanattitude.org/index.php?post/2010/05/27/lobbying-anti-éolien
www.sortirdunucleaire.org/index.php?menu=sinformer&sousmenu=themas&soussousmenu=eoliennes&page=index
www.agoravox.fr/actualites/politique/article/le-demantelement-de-l-etat-133020

vendredi 31 mai 2013

productivisme

An extremely important message for a society whose best-intentioned members have lost themselves in a
wilderness of wishful thinking.”
 “This book takes a look at the dark underbelly of ‘green energy’ and attempts to shift the U.S. dialogue to a more pressing problem: consumption.”




Productivism is the belief that measurable economic productivity and growth is the purpose of human organization (e.g., work), and that "more production is necessarily good". Critiques of productivism center primarily on the limits to growth on a finite planet and extend into discussions of human procreation, the work ethic, and even alternative energy production

Welvaart door schaarste?

Omdat de consumptionist denkt dat productie ingeperkt wordt door het verlangen om te consumeren (en dus niet dat consumptie ingeperkt wordt door de mogelijkheid om te produceren), hecht de consumptionist geen waarde aan welvaart maar aan de afwezigheid van welvaart. Na de Tweede Wereldoorlog dacht de consumptionist bijvoorbeeld dat de relatieve afwezigheid van huizen, auto's, televisies en koelkasten in Europa een voordeel voor de Europese economie betekende, omdat er een grote hoeveelheid ongebruikt consumptieverlangen was, dat zogezegd zorgde voor een sterke vraag naar consumptie. Volgens dezelfde redenering dacht de consumptionist dat de relatieve overvloed van deze goederen in de V.S. een nadeel voor de Amerikaanse economie betekende omdat de hoeveelheid consumptieverlangen nu kleiner was, wat zogezegd de vraag naar consumptie verzwakte. Welvaart hangt dus af van de afwezigheid van rijkdom, en armoede volgt als er een overvloed aan rijkdom is – zo besluit de consumptionist – omdat dat ontzettend waardevolle ding, consumptieverlangen, zeldzamer dan diamanten, geproduceerd wordt door de afwezigheid van welvaart en vernietigd wordt door de aanwezigheid van rijkdom. Het is dit principe dat ertoe leidt dat de consumptionist oorlog en vernietiging prijst als bronnen van welvaart, en dat hij de armoede in depressies wijt aan "overproductie".
 Door meer mensen op de wereld te zetten, brengt men meer consumptieverlangen in de wereld. Het bestaan van een groter aantal mensen, zo zegt de consumptionist aan ondernemers, zal het mogelijk maken voor ondernemingen om een afzetmarkt te vinden voor al die goederen die anders overbodig zijn. Bedrijven zullen floreren omdat hun aanbod aan goederen beantwoord zal worden door een adequate hoeveelheid verlangen naar die goederen. In afwezigheid van zo'n hoog geboortecijfer (of naast een hoog geboortecijfer) gelooft de consumptionist ook dat reclame de anders volledig verzadigde consumenten nieuwe verlangens kan suggereren. En technologische vooruitgang kan nieuwe aanwendingen voorzien voor een steeds groter wordende hoeveelheid kapitaalgoederen, die anders geen "investeringsmogelijkheden" zou vinden. Mocht het voorgaande falen, dan kunnen we nog steeds rekenen op de overheid om ons van grenzeloze consumptie te voorzien, zelfs als er geen verlangen is. Of misschien – zo hoopt de consumptionist – heeft een land geluk, en wordt ze bedreigd door buitenlandse vijanden, zodat dit land een grote defensie in stand moet houden. In beide gevallen gelooft de consumptionist dat de overheid in staat zal zijn om welvaart te promoten door haar consumptie te ruilen voor de goederen die mensen produceren.
Om voortdurende kapitaalsaccumulatie mogelijk te maken is technologische vooruitgang onontbeerlijk. Alleen technologische vooruitgang kan zorgen voor aanhoudende toenames in de productie, en alleen die toenames in de productie kunnen zorgen voor voortdurende kapitaalsaccumulatie.
rothbard.be/artikels/118-productie-versus-consumptie

niet helemaal akkoord met het geheel , er zitten wmb evenveel goed als vreemd geformuleerde passages in maar dat kan ook voor een deel aan de vertaling liggen ?
maar het legt wat denktranten bloot en tegenstellingen die geen tegenstellingen zijn maar de beide kanten van hetzelfde
www.capitalism.net/Capitalism/CAPITALISM_Internet.pdf

jeudi 23 mai 2013

cuckoo's nest




www.nytimes.com/1986/08/04/books/books-of-the-times-513286.html

www.crom.be/fr/documents/woodstock-le-festival-du-verseau-de-la-cia

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKUltra
 

Experimentation with psychoactive drugs

At the instigation of Perry Lane neighbor and Stanford psychology graduate student Vik Lovell, an acquaintance of Richard Alpert and Allen Ginsberg, Kesey volunteered to take part in a CIA-financed study under the aegis of Project MKULTRA, a highly secret military program, at the Menlo Park Veterans Hospital where he worked as a night aide. The project studied the effects of psychoactive drugs, particularly LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, cocaine, aMT, and DMT on people. Kesey wrote many detailed accounts of his experiences with these drugs, both during the study and in the years of private experimentation that followed. Kesey's role as a medical guinea pig, as well as his stint working at the state veterans' hospital, inspired him to write One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. The success of this book, as well as the demolition of the Perry Lane cabins in August 1963, allowed him to move to a log house at 7940 La Honda Road in La Honda, California, an hour south of San Francisco. He frequently entertained friends and many others with parties he called "Acid Tests", involving music (such as Kesey's favorite band, The Warlocks, later known as the Grateful Dead), black lights, fluorescent paint, strobes, and other "psychedelic" effects, and, of course, LSD. These parties were noted in some of Ginsberg's poems and are also described in Tom Wolfe's The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test, as well as Hell's Angels: The Strange and Terrible Saga of the Outlaw Motorcycle Gangs by Hunter S. Thompson and Freewheelin Frank, Secretary of the Hell's Angels by Frank Reynolds.

One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest

The inspiration for One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest came while working on the night shift (with Gordon Lish) at the Menlo Park Veterans' Hospital. There, Kesey often spent time talking to the patients, sometimes under the influence of the hallucinogenic drugs with which he had volunteered to experiment. Kesey did not believe that these patients were insane, but rather that society had pushed them out because they did not fit the conventional ideas of how people were supposed to act and behave. Published under the guidance of Cowley in 1962, the novel was an immediate success; in 1963, it was adapted into a successful stage play by Dale Wasserman, and in 1975, Miloš Forman directed a screen adaptation, which won the "Big Five" Academy Awards: Best Picture, Best Actor (Jack Nicholson), Best Actress (Louise Fletcher), Best Director (Forman) and Best Adapted Screenplay (Lawrence Hauben, Bo Goldman).
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Kesey

lundi 15 avril 2013

StrawMan.jpg
Stroman kan verwijzen naar:

Stroman
  • Een pop gemaakt van stro, die vaak gebruikt wordt als vogelverschrikker.
  • In de retorica en logica is een stroman een drogreden. Het is het veranderen van een uitspraak van een tegenstander in een andere uitspraak, die veel makkelijker te weerleggen is dan de eerste. Voor meer uitleg over deze drogreden, zie stropopredenering.
  • In de politiek is een stroman, ook wel marionet genoemd, een leider die slechts de jure aan de macht is, terwijl de werkelijke macht berust bij iemand anders,
  • In de handel is een stroman iemand die een transactie in opdracht van een ander verricht. Op deze wijze blijft de identiteit van de opdrachtgever verborgen,

Een stropopredenering is een type drogreden waarbij men niet het werkelijke standpunt van de tegenstander weerlegt maar een (karikaturale) variant daarvan.
Men interpreteert het standpunt van de tegenstander zodanig dat deze gemakkelijk te weerleggen is en suggereert dan dat dat het werkelijke standpunt van de tegenstander is.
 De aanval op een echte stropop, zoals een vogelverschrikker, kan de illusie wekken krachtig en effectief te zijn, terwijl een echte tegenstander de aanval misschien zou kunnen pareren. De krachtsverhoudingen tussen de aanvaller en de verdediger waarvoor de stropop model staat worden dan verkeerd voorgesteld.


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barley


OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Also sprach Zarathustra

       een enkel opbeurend woord
  en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eschatology

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoroastrian
de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Also_sprach_Zarathustra
   www.zoroaster.net/indexe.htm

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

 
http://dejister.wordpress.com/2010/08/17/een-draaiend-tropaeum/

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO


books.google.fr/books?id=GzJIC6Ve4r0C&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30&dq=spiegelen+jung&source=bl&ots=22qm1ozzBY&sig=n0II6Vf_-5BQKgkKCpcThrsdQIw&hl=fr&sa=X&ei=zXklT4bMBpG7hAevmLX7BA&ved=0CDoQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=spiegelen jung&f=false


 

samedi 13 avril 2013

 Van geheugenverlies tot infobesitas

  A Conspiracy So Immense

E-mail Print PDF
national_park_service_9-11NEW YORK - Is this the Age of the Conspiracy Theory? Plenty of evidence suggests that we are in something of a golden age for citizen speculation, documentation, and inference that takes shape - usually on the Internet - and spreads virally around the globe. In the process, conspiracy theories are pulled from the margins of public discourse, where they were generally consigned in the past, and sometimes into the very heart of politics.
I learned this by accident. Having written a book about the hijacking of executive power in the United States in the Bush years, I found myself, in researching new developments, stumbling upon conversations online that embrace narratives of behind-the-scenes manipulation.
There are some major themes. A frequent one in the US is that global elites are plotting - via the Bilderberg Group and the Council on Foreign Relations, among others - to establish a "One World Government" dominated by themselves rather than national governments. Sometimes, more folkloric details come into play, broadening the members of this cabal to include the Illuminati, the Freemasons, Rhodes Scholars, or, as always, the Jews.

Naomi Wolf

 naomi wolf Naomi Wolf, the author, most recently, of The End of America: Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot and the forthcoming Give me Liberty: How to Become an American Revolutionary, is co-founder of the American Freedom Campaign, a US democracy movement.
The hallmarks of this narrative are familiar to anyone who has studied the transmission of certain story categories in times of crisis. In literary terms, this conspiracy theory closely resembles The Protocols of the Elders of Zion , featuring secretive global elite with great power and wicked aims. Historically, there tends to be the same set of themes: fearsome, uncontrolled transformative change led by educated, urbanized cosmopolitans. Students of Weimar Germany know that sudden dislocations and shocks - rapid urbanization, disruption of traditional family and social ties, loosening of sexual restrictions, and economic collapse - primed many Germans to become receptive to simplistic theories that seemed to address their confusion and offer a larger meaning to their suffering.
Similarly, the "9/11 Truth Movement" asserts that al-Qaeda's attack on the Twin Towers was an "inside job." In the Muslim world, there is a widespread conspiracy theory that the Israelis were behind those attacks, and that all Jews who worked in the buildings stayed home that day.
Usually, conspiracy theories surface where people are poorly educated and a rigorous independent press is lacking. So why are such theories gaining adherents in the US and other affluent democracies nowadays?
Today's explosion of conspiracy theories has been stoked by the same conditions that drove their acceptance in the past: rapid social change and profound economic uncertainty. A clearly designated "enemy" with an unmistakable "plan" is psychologically more comforting than the chaotic evolution of social norms and the workings - or failures - of unfettered capitalism. And, while conspiracy theories are often patently irrational, the questions they address are often healthy, even if the answers are frequently unsourced or just plain wrong.
In seeking answers, these citizens are reacting rationally to irrational realities. Many citizens believe, rightly, that their mass media are failing to investigate and document abuses. Newspapers in most advanced countries are struggling or folding, and investigative reporting is often the first thing they cut. Concentration of media ownership and control further fuels popular mistrust, setting the stage for citizen investigation to enter the vacuum.
Likewise, in an age when corporate lobbyists have a free hand in shaping - if not drafting - public policies, many people believe, again rightly, that their elected officials no longer represent them. Hence their impulse to believe in unseen forces.
Finally, even rational people have become more receptive to certain conspiracy theories because, in the last eight years, we actually have seen some sophisticated conspiracies. The Bush administration conspired to lead Americans and others into an illegal war, using fabricated evidence to do so. Is it any wonder, then, that so many rational people are trying to make sense of a political reality that really has become unusually opaque? When even the 9/11 commissioners renounce their own conclusions (because they were based on evidence derived from torture), is it surprising that many want a second investigation?
Frequently enough, it is citizens digging at the margins of the discourse - pursuing such theories - who report on news that the mainstream media ignores. For example, it took a "conspiracy theorist," Alex Jones, to turn up documentation of microwave technologies to be used by police forces on US citizens. The New Yorker confirmed the story much later - without crediting the original source.
The mainstream media's tendency to avoid checking out or reporting what is actually newsworthy in Internet conspiracy theories partly reflects class bias. Conspiracy theories are seen as vulgar and lowbrow. So even good, critical questions or well-sourced data unearthed by citizen investigators tend to be regarded as radioactive to highly educated formal journalists.
The real problem with this frantic conspiracy theorizing is that it leaves citizens emotionally agitated but without a solid ground of evidence upon which to base their worldview, and without constructive directions in which to turn their emotions. This is why so many threads of discussion turn from potentially interesting citizen speculation to hate speech and paranoia. In a fevered environment, without good editorial validation or tools for sourcing, citizens can be preyed upon and whipped up by demagogues, as we saw in recent weeks at Sarah Palin's rallies after Internet theories painted Barack Obama as a terrorist or in league with terrorists.
We need to change the flow of information in the Internet age. Citizens should be able more easily to leak information, pitch stories, and send leads to mainstream investigative reporters. They should organize new online entities in which they pay a fee for direct investigative reporting, unmediated by corporate pressures. And citizen investigators should be trained in basic journalism: finding good data, confirming stories with two independent sources, using quotes responsibly, and eschewing anonymity - that is, standing by their own bylines, as conventional reporters do.
This is how citizens can be taken - and take themselves - seriously as documenters and investigators of our common situation. In a time of official lies, healthy investigative energy should shed light, not just generate heat.
Naomi Wolf, the author of The End of America: Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot and Give Me Liberty: A Handbook for American Revolutionaries, is co-founder of the American Freedom Campaign, a US democracy movement.
www.guatemala-times.com/opinion/syndicated/the-next-wave/483-a-conspiracy-so-immense.html

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory
 fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Théorie_du_complot

kleine voorkeur voor de franse , (plaatjes) en door het lezen van
www.athenaeum.nl/recensies/umberto-eco-de-begraafplaats-van-praag


Informatie in stukjes

Grote brokken informatie toedienen, de lezer zodanig overvoeren dat hij het overzicht verliest, is een strategie die Simone zelf ook toepast. Gedurende zijn leven werkt hij aan een anti-Joods geschrift, een zogenaamd verslag van een fictieve samenzwering op een joodse begraafplaats in Praag van rabbijnen die plannen smeden om in heel Europa grote macht te verwerven. Het verslag is gebaseerd op de werkelijk bestaande Protocollen van de wijzen van Zion, waaruit Hitler in Mein Kampf als bron heeft geput. Simonini stuurt zijn Protocollen stukje bij beetje de wereld in, waarbij steeds nieuwe, snode 'onthullingen' van de rabbijnen naar buiten komen.
'Als je explosieve informatie in één keer toedient, slaat die weliswaar in als een bom, maar zijn de mensen alles binnen de kortste keren weer vergeten. Je moet de berichten daarom mondjesmaat verstrekken, want dan zal elk nieuw bericht het voorgaande weer in herinnering roepen.'
Met de totstandkoming van de protocollen geeft Eco een prachtig inzicht in de groei van het antisemitisme tegen het einde van de negentiende eeuw. Maar de inzet van De begraafplaats van Praag voert breder. Informatie is een tijdloos thema dat nu, met WikiLeaks, weer bijzonder actueel is. Wie heeft de macht over informatie, welke informatie besluit je te verspreiden, wat is het effect op het publiek? Of het feitelijke of fictieve informatie is (zoals Simonini's Protocollen), doet daarbij niet eens ter zake: De begraafplaats van Praag laat zien hoe moeiteloos waarheid en verzinsels door elkaar lopen. Iedereen, van journalisten tot politici, pikt er het materiaal uit dat voor hem relevant is, om zijn eigen boodschap mee te ondersteunen

Nineteenth-century Europe - from Turin to Prague to Paris - abounds with the ghastly and the mysterious. Conspiracies rule history. Jesuits plot against Freemasons. Italian republicans strangle priests with their own intestines. French criminals plan bombings by day and celebrate black masses at night.
Every nation has its own secret service, perpetrating forgeries, plots, and massacres. From the unification of Italy to the Paris Commune to the Dreyfus Affair to notorious forgery The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, Europe is in tumult and everyone needs a scapegoat. But what if, behind all of these conspiracies both real and imagined, lay one lone man?
And what if that evil genius created the most infamous document of all? Eco takes his readers on an unforgettable journey through the underbelly of world-shattering events. "The Prague Cemetery" is Umberto Eco at his most exciting, a novel immediately hailed as his masterpiece.

een kritisch oog :

Political use

   In a paper written in 2008, Cass Sunstein, legal scholar, and Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, wrote of appropriate government responses to conspiracy theories. In the paper he stated:

What can government do about conspiracy theories? Among the things it can do, what should it do? We can readily imagine a series of possible responses. (1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories. (3) Government might itself engage in counterspeech, marshaling arguments to discredit conspiracy theories. (4) Government might formally hire credible private parties to engage in counterspeech. (5) Government might engage in informal communication with such parties, encouraging them to help. Each instrument has a distinctive set of potential effects, or costs and benefits, and each will have a place under imaginable conditions. However, our main policy idea is that government should engage in cognitive infiltration of the groups that produce conspiracy theories, which involves a mix of (3), (4) and (5)

vooral dat dus :  However, our main policy idea is that government should engage in cognitive infiltration of the groups that produce conspiracy theories