Fuxi en zijn zus/echtgenote Nüwa, twee van de 'Drie Verhevenen', afgebeeld als twee ineengekronkelde slangen met in hun handen een passer en een winkelhaak.
Posted at 09/25/2012 10:29 AM | Updated as of 09/25/2012 10:29 AM
TAIYUAN- A Chinese factory owned by iPhone assembler Foxconn
resumed production on Tuesday after a riot involving 2,000 workers had
forced it to close for 24 hours, in an incident that put Chinese labor
conditions back under the microscope.
The huge factory that employs some 79,000 workers in northern Taiyuan
city erupted into violence late on Sunday and into the early hours of
Monday morning after what the plant's owner, Foxconn Technology Group of
Taiwan, described as a personal dispute that spun out of control.
Workers on Tuesday morning walked back through the gates of the
factory, which was still ringed by police and showed clear signs of
damage caused by the fighting, in which 40 people were injured,
according to Foxconn and Chinese local media.
Some gates were still flat on the ground, having been bent over, and
windows were smashed. A loud speaker on a loop recording called for
people to maintain social order.
Foxconn, which assembles Apple's iPhones as well as making components
for other global electronics firms, h as faced accusations of poor
conditions and mistreatment of workers at its plants in China, where it
employs about 1 million people.
The company says it has been spending heavily in recent months to improve working conditions and to raise wages.
Foxconn spokesman Louis Woo said on Tuesday that the one-day closure would not disrupt supplies from the factory.
"We have 79,000 people working in the Taiyuan campus, and we always have spare inventory," Woo said.
Foxconn does not confirm which of its plants supply Apple, but an
employee told Reuters that the Taiyuan plant was among those that
assembled and made parts for Apple's iPhone 5.
Foxconn said in a statement the incident had escalated from a row
between several employees at around 11 p.m. on Sunday in the privately
managed workers' dormitory, and was brought under control by police at
around 3 a.m.
Comments posted online, however, suggested security guards may have been to blame.
Foxconn is the trading name of Hon Hai Precision Industry Co , the world's largest contract maker of electronics
(from the making of history to the making of future ?)
Van het boekje ' Het verschijnsel mens' intrigeerde de achterflap waarop vermeld stond dat de schrijver een jesuiet was en in China (Peking) werkzaam was (geweest), nu had ik toevallig in een ander {boekje} gelezen dat de paleontologie in Peking door de Rockefeller foundation gefinancierd werd , dus de moeite waard om eens goed op te letten.
Pierre Teilhard de Chardin was a Jesuit priest-theologian and a distinguished
geologist-paleontologist, who was born in France in 1881 and died in
New York City in 1955. Following teaching posts in Paris and Cairo,
he was assigned to China for many years. In China, Teilhard became imbued
with a vision of working to build the future.
Teilhard
opines that the destiny of man is to culminate into a consciousness
of the species.
This consciousness of mankind will ultimately become the "thinking
layer of the earth," which Teilhard calls the *noosphere.*
Cosmic evolution will not cease with the noosphere. Teilhard does not
consider the human species to be the epitome of the universe; rather,
he believes that Nature provides us with yet another evolutionary opening...that
of a "super-soul above our souls." The whole "gigantic
psycho-biological operation" of cosmic evolution points toward
a "mega-synthesis" of all the thinking elements of the earth
forcing an entree into the realm of the super-human.
Teilhard refers to the super-human as the Omega Point. It is, for him,
the apex of cosmic evolution. Teilhard, scientifically speaking, can
only imagine what the reality of Omega might be like...a *pure conscious
energy.* Teilhard proclaims this cosmic energy almost in the mode of
poetry. "In the discovery of the sidereal world, so vast that it
seems to do away with all proportion between our own being and the dimensions
of the cosmos around us, only one reality seems to survive and be capable
of succeeding and spanning the infinitesimal and the immense: energy...
that floating, universal entity from which all emerges and into which
all falls back as into an ocean; energy...the new spirit; energy...the
new god.
Het oude boekje blijkt toch nog in de belangstelling te staan
Pierre Teilhard De Chardin: Father Of The New Age Movement
The
aim of the article below is to, hopefully, highlight just a few of the
connections between the Vatican, the New Age movement, the United
Nations and the wider New World Order agenda by taking a look at
palaeontologist and French Jesuit, Catholic, priest, Pierre Teilhard de
Chardin.
In
the influential and very successful book "The Aquarian Conspiracy", by
Marilyn Ferguson, a survey of new agers showed that the leading
influence on their spiritual 'awakening' was Pierre Teilhard de Chardin.
The book itself was described as a "handbook for the new age" that "sought a paradigm shift in global consciousness".
Gary Kah, in his book 'En Route to Global Occupation' (p. 41), said of Chardin:
"[He] is one of the most frequently quoted writers by leading New Age occultists."
A
claim further supported by Dave Hunt and T.A. McMahon, in their book
'The Seduction of Christianity: Spiritual Discernment in the Last Days'
(p. 80) when they said:
"Teilhard
dreamed of humanity merging into 'God' and each realising his own
godhood at the Omega point. This belief has inspired many of today's New
Age leaders."
From
the above quotes it's easy to see how Chardin became known as the
'Father of the New Age'. We also catch an early glimpse of a spiritual
belief system that is almost identical to the 'one consciousness' or 'we
are all one' beliefs of David Icke and others in the 'truth' and 'new
age' movements. A point emphasised by Chardin himself when he said:
"I can be saved only by becoming one with the universe."
Pierre Teilhard de Chardin was among the
first to give serious consideration to the future of human evolution. His work
advocates both biotechnologies (e.g., genetic engineering) and intelligence
technologies. He discusses the emergence of a global computation-communication
system (and is said by some to have been the first to have envisioned the
Internet). He advocates the development of a global society. Teilhard is almost
surely the first to discuss the acceleration of technological progress to a
Singularity in which human intelligence will become super-intelligence. He discusses
the spread of human intelligence into the universe and its amplification into a
cosmic intelligence. More recently, his work has been taken up by Barrow and
Tipler; Tipler; Moravec; and Kurzweil. Of course, Teilhard’s Omega Point Theory
is deeply Christian, which may be difficult for secular transhumanists. But
transhumanism cannot avoid a fateful engagement with Christianity. Christian
institutions may support or oppose transhumanism. Since Christianity is an
extremely powerful cultural force in the West, it is imperative for
transhumanism to engage it carefully. A serious study of Teilhard can help that
engagement and will thus be rewarding to both communities.
At this point, it must be admitted that one of the most
serious criticisms of Teilhard bears precisely on this point: an optimism which
tends to look at existential evil and suffering through the small end of the
telescope. It is unfortunately true that Teilhard, like many other Christians,
regarded the dead and wounded of Hiroshima with a certain equanimity as
inevitable by-products of scientific and evolutionary progress. He was much
more impressed with the magnificent scientific achievement of the atomic
physicists than he was with the consequences of dropping the bomb. It
must be added immediately that the physicists themselves did not all see things
exactly as he did. The concern of a Niels Bohr and his dogged struggle to
prevent the atomic arms race put Bohr with Rieux and Tarrou in the category of
“Sisyphean” heroes that are entirely congenial to Camus. After the Bikini test,
Teilhard exclaimed that the new bombs “show a humanity which is at peace both
internally and externally.” And he
added beatifically, “they announce the coming of the spirit on earth.” (L’Avenir de l’homme)
Both Camus and Teilhard firmly took their stand on what
they considered to be the side of life. Both saw humanity confronted
with a final choice, a “grand option,” between the “spirit of force” and the
“spirit of love,” between “division” and “convergence.” Man’s destiny is
in his own hands, and everything depends on whether he chooses life and
creativity or death and destruction. Teilhard’s scientific mystique and
long-range view, extending over millennia, naturally did not delay overlong to
worry about the death of a few thousands here and there. Camus could still pause
and have scruples over the murder of an innocent child. He refused to justify
that death in the name of God. He also refused to justify it by an appeal to
history, to evolution, to science, to politics, or to the glorious future of the
new man.
In short, Teilhard de Chardin's devotion to the powerful generalities
of modernity blinded him to the plight of particular men living in the
world.
*************paleontology
Almost from the outset, Woodward's reconstruction of the Piltdown fragments was strongly challenged by some researchers. At the Royal College of Surgeons,
copies of the same fragments used by the British Museum in their
reconstruction were used to produce an entirely different model, one
that in brain size and other features resembled a modern human. This
reconstruction, by Prof. (later Sir) Arthur Keith, was called Homo piltdownensis in reflection of its more human appearance. The find was also considered legitimate by Otto Schoetensack who had discovered the Heidelberg fossils just a few years earlier; he described it as being the best evidence for an ape-like ancestor of modern humans.French archeologist Pierre Teilhard de Chardin participated in the uncovery of the Piltdown skull with Woodward.
Woodward's reconstruction included ape-like canine teeth, which was itself controversial. In August 1913, Woodward, Dawson and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin,
a Jesuit priest and friend of Dawson who had trained as a
paleontologist and geologist, began a systematic search of the spoil
heaps specifically to find the missing canines. Teilhard de Chardin soon
found a canine that, according to Woodward, fitted the jaw perfectly. A
few days later Teilhard de Chardin moved to France and took no further
part in the discoveries. Noting that the tooth "corresponds exactly with
that of an ape",Woodward expected the find to end any dispute over his reconstruction
of the skull. However, Keith attacked the find. Keith pointed out that
human molars are the result of side to side movement when chewing. The
canine in the Piltdown jaw was impossible as it prevented side to side
movement. To explain the wear on the molar teeth, the canine could not
have been any higher than the molars. Grafton Elliot Smith,
a fellow anthropologist, sided with Woodward, and at the next Royal
Society meeting claimed that Keith's opposition was motivated entirely
by ambition. Keith later recalled, "Such was the end of our long
friendship."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown_Man
and knowing from {} he usually had many old teeth in his pockets
Early 20th century science /?sarcasm?\
The Piltdown case is an example of how racial and nationalist factors
shaped some science at the time. Piltdown's semi-human features were
explained by reference to non-white ethnicities whom some Europeans of
that time considered a lower form of human.
The influence of nationalism is clear in the differing interpretations
of the find: whilst the majority of British scientists accepted the
discovery as "the Earliest Englishman",European and American scientists were considerably more sceptical, and
several suggested at the time that the skull and jaw were from two
different creatures and had been accidentally mixed up. Regarding the sex of the find, it was discussed as a male, although
Woodward suggested that the specimen discovered might be female. The
only exception to this was in coverage by the Daily Express newspaper, which referred to the discovery as a woman, but only to use it to mock the Suffragette movement of the time, of which the Express was highly critical.
{} https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustav_Heinrich_Ralph_von_Koenigswald, work ISBN 0-472-05020-6
"marchands de lumière" L’arrivée à maturité du projet universaliste dont témoigne cette stratégie mondiale s’appuie sur
la foi en la toute-puissance de la science pour assurer le progrès humain, foi qui devient à
partir du début des années 1920 le pilier du projet philanthropique.
uit : La fondation Rockefeller et la naissance de l’universalisme philantropique américain
Fuxi en zijn zus/echtgenote Nüwa, twee van de 'Drie Verhevenen', afgebeeld als twee ineengekronkelde slangen met in hun handen een passer en een winkelhaak.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_Emperor
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Sovereigns_and_Five_Emperors
